Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Critical Reading – Matthias Ojo

Matthias Ojo
Professor Licastro
September 27, 2015

Philip K. Dick employs the theme of empathy into his novel, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? In his novel, Dick incorporates the subject of posthumanism and gives the reader controversial situations to ponder on. One of those topics include the term human and what it means to called human. Dick then takes this broad topic into depth through his novel and discusses whether technology can be become so advanced that robots will one day be indistinguishable from humans. Although this is something that a lot of people cannot fathom, it is a certain reality. Technology is rapidly becoming a vital part of the life of humans. Humans have become dependent on the abilities of technology. The abilities of technology range from something as simple as depending on an alarm clock on a phone so one can be woken up to having Siri or Google give an answer to every and any question anyone may have without an exercise of control over them. However, these advancements in technology are not what Philip K. Dick discusses in his novel. In his novel, Dick displays that technology will reach a point where robots will be nearly indistinguishable from humans. However, in his novel, Dick uses the ability to exhibit empathy as a distinguishing factor that separates humans from robots or androids.
In Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, the androids that are hunted out to be retired are incapable of displaying empathetic emotions. In order to distinguish these very humanlike androids called the Nexus-6, from humans, an empathy test called the Voight-Kampff Empathy test is administered to a subject to determine whether the subject was really a human or an android. The results of the test determined whether the test subject was an android based on its incapability to display empathy in response to a series of questions. “An android no matter how gifted as to pure intellectual capacity, could not make sense out of the fusion which took place routinely among the followers of Mercerism-an experience which he, and virtually anyone else, including subnormal chickenheads managed with no difficulty” (Dick 30). In one scenario, Rick, the main character administers the test to a woman named Rachael who Rick thought was a human prior to the test. After administering the test to Rachael, Rick deemed her to be an android because she did not respond to the questions with empathy as a normal human would have. However, Rick was told that Rachael was not an android, but scored like an android would have, because she grew up aboard the Salamander 3. “She was born on it; she spent four of her eighteen years living of its tape library and what the nine other crew members, all adults, knew about Earth” (Dick 53). Rachael had been raised with different morals and beliefs on empathy than the post Terminus humans were. This lie convinces the reader that Rachael is actually a human and not an android until the reader eventually finds out that Rachael is actually an android.
Humans used the Voight-Kampff Empathy test to determine whether a subject was an android or a human. Rachael’s responses to the empathy test told Rick that she was indeed an android. As an android she had not empathy for animals. When asked questions regarding animals, Rachael was unable to give an empathetic answer because she was not human. However, this statement seems like an obvious reason, but it is a topic of controversy because the idea of learned empathy is introduced into the novel. Empathy is not a learned characteristic. It is a natural trait that humans possess and express with other humans. Humans cannot empathize with androids because they are not human and in the same manner androids cannot empathize with humans because they are not androids. The two subjects are not the same being which means they cannot empathize with one another. Contrary to the idea employed in the book, empathy is not something that androids can learn. It is something that humans either do or do not do. Not all humans empathize, but of those that do, they empathize with other humans and sympathize with everything else.
Empathy is not a valid test to determine whether one is human or not. Empathy is a personality trait not a broad human trait. Some humans actually fail to empathize with one another. Dick displayed this characteristic in the character of Phil Resch who did not display empathy towards an android. In the novel, Phil retires an android named Luba Luft in cold blood after becoming angry at it. Rick eventually realized that Phil enjoyed killing as a hobby, when in fact he is supposed to be filled with empathy as a human. This confused Rick because according to Mercerism, the religion practiced by most of the world in the novel, empathy is a trait that humans should possess. When Phil failed to display empathy towards Luba Loft and Garland, Rick concluded that Phil just enjoyed killing. “I see a pattern. The way you killed Garland and then the way you killed Luba. You don’t kill the way I do; you don’t try to—Hell,” he said. “I know what it is. You like to kill. All you need is a pretext. If you had a pretext, you’d kill me. That’s why you picked up on the possibility of Garland being an android; it made him available for being killed” (Dick 137). Upon this realization, Rick invoked the thought in the reader that maybe humans are either incapable of displaying empathy or are capable of losing empathy. Phil’s actions did not correlate with the beliefs of post Terminus times and this controversial personality conflict sheds some light on human character flaws as well as a flaw in the empathy test.
In reality, Empathy is only a human characteristic and capability. Although Nexus-6 androids become so advanced that they develop feelings, they are still not capable of expressing empathy. Dick manipulates the meaning of the word empathy in his novel, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?. The androids in the novel are able to learn empathy, but empathy is not learned. It is a natural trait that develops in humans throughout life. Therefore, the androids technically were not capable of expressing empathy, but they may have been capable of understanding and expressing sympathy. Sympathy is the ability to understand the feelings of someone else without actually experiencing their feelings, while empathy is the ability to understand as well as share mutual feelings with another person. Humans are able to empathize with one another sometimes because they are the same being. However, they cannot empathize with anything not of the same being. In that situation, humans would be sympathizing because although they have not experienced what the other being, whether a dog or a robot, has experienced, they can understand from an objective view and sympathize with them because they are of two different beings. In the same manner, the androids in the novel were incapable of empathizing with humans or with themselves for two reasons. They were incapable of empathizing in general because they were robots and they do not naturally possess that trait. They were also incapable of expressing empathy because they are of a different being than humans. As simple as it may sound, androids are robots, and humans are humans, which does not enable each group to empathize with one another. However, they are able to sympathize with one another.
Dick’s manipulation of the word empathy brings up the question of what actually makes humans, human. As simple as that question may sound, it is a perplexing question that still remains subjective. In the novel, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, the display of empathy is used as a distinguishing factor that separates humans from androids. However, this distinguishing factor contains flaws because empathy is a natural trait and in the novel androids learn to develop empathy. In addition, humans sometimes fail to express empathy, as seen in the character of Phil Resch. The ability to express empathy does separate humans from androids, but for those humans who cannot empathize because of a lack of experience; it defines something which makes humans, human-personality.

Dick, Philip K. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? New York: Ballantine Books, 1996. Print.

4 thoughts on “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? Critical Reading – Matthias Ojo

  1. I really enjoyed reading your reflection! I liked that you brought up many interesting ideas and did a lot of deep thinking about this complicated topic. However, I would like to challenge your ideas a bit. I, personally, believe that it is possible to empathize with non-human beings. Empathy involves understanding what another is feeling because of having experienced the same or a similar situation. For example, if you have experienced loss, then you can empathize with someone else who has experienced it as well. By this definition, it would make sense that empathy can pass through the barrier of “species”. If a dog is mourning the loss of someone, you can empathize with them. And, hypothetically, this would be true when robots/androids are concerned. If an android lost someone who they care for, why wouldn’t a human who has also experienced lost be able to empathize with them? It is definitely a complicated topic though, and one where it is important to think of it as a spectrum of gray rather than just a black/white argument.

    Like

  2. I really enjoyed reading your critical reading. I think that you should go back and read through and edit it once more. I noticed for instance, in the first paragraph you say the same phrase twice, in almost identical words… Not sure if this was intentional or accidental, but I find that reading it out loud makes it easiest to catch mistakes! Just so you know, the sentence I was referring to was about technology being “indistinguishable from humans.” I think that your use of textual evidence was really good, but i personally would have like to have seen more reference to other works we had looked at in class, like connecting it to R.U.R or even to the Stepford Wives movie!

    Like

  3. Great post Ojo. I completely agree with prior comments that another read through either out loud with another person or having a peer review would correct some of the redundant sentences and grammatical errors in your essay. To continue on with a prior comment, I think you should challenge your belief in androids and humans being able to show empathy. Going all the way back to the fishbowl, you talked about how Rick could not be empathetic but rather sympathetic. In my opinion the line between human and android is not so clear. As a result, the empathetic and sympathetic qualities can be possessed by both sides, because as the book goes on, the androids and humans become one and one in the same. From sex, to will to live, to emotions, and even to tribulations. They both can develop feelings and love for each other. That at its core is empathy. One great connection you can bring in here, if you so decide to revise, is talk about how in the stepford wives movie, the men (human) fall in love with their wives (androids). Do you remember when the two main characters walk into a house and hear that the male homeowner is having sex with his android wife? In order to draw these comparisons you need to take your person feelings and put them to the side, so that you can use the evidence in class as support. Sure, it doesn’t make sense that humans could develop feelings for androids, but it is possible. Lastly, when you ask the question, what makes a human human?, give us your answer. You never fully tell us what makes a human human. We have learned in class that a human has emotions and a soul. But, in the book, androids start to possess these characteristics. See where I am going with this?

    Like

  4. I’m confused with a lot of the points you’re making here. At one point you say “Empathy is not a learned characteristic. It is a natural trait that humans possess and express with other humans.” Only to say, just lines later that “Empathy is not a valid test to determine whether one is human or not. Empathy is a personality trait not a broad human trait. Some humans actually fail to empathize with one another.” I think you have to pick one. It’s a pretty broad claim to say that anything is intrinsically human, and you’ll need to back that up. But you definitely can’t, at least without some clarification if that’s possible, contradict yourself by saying it’s a “natural trait” but then saying that not everyone has it.

    You’ve also said that “Humans cannot empathize with androids because they are not human and in the same manner androids cannot empathize with humans because they are not androids.” Where is your evidence for this? While it’s debatable whether or not Rachael had empathy for Rick, I’d say that there is no question about Rick’s feelings for Rachael; he is explicit about the way he cares for her. He throws his whole mission to kill the androids for her, something completely inefficient, and he wouldn’t have done it for absolutely no reason. It’s about how he feels for her, and he definitely feels for her.

    Also, how reliable is human empathy in this novel when characters can, and do, use machinery to change how they feel and to become empathetic? If your emotions and empathy, something you’ve (somewhat?) characterized as “naturally” human, can be controlled by a piece of machinery (much like an android is), then how is that different than an android feeling? In other words, if a machine can make people feel, why can’t an android, since an android is also a machine? And how highly should human empathy be valued, then, if it can literally be changed at the turn of a dial? I think you’ve been put-off by the idea of humans and androids becoming indistinguishable, at least it seems that way in class, but I think you should really open your ideas to all the factors that go on in the novel, and provide thorough evidence for all of your claims.

    Like

Leave a comment